Blog
From korrekt.org
This is my, well, semi-blog. There is currently no way of adding comments, which can be only sent to me via email (Denny and I will address this remaining limitation when we find the time). You can also obtain these notes as an RSS feed.
Contents |
OWL 2 and how to cite it
Oct 27 2009. It's done! The OWL 2 Web Ontology Language is a W3C Recommendation. Many OWL tools are already compatible with the new specs, and it is expected that all are transitioning to the newer version. OWL 2 consists of many (13) documents, but it has a short overview document and an extended Primer as entry points.
Thus, only one question is left open: how should you cite the new standard? I recommend the following bibtex entries for the aforementioned references:
@book{owl2-overview,
author = {W3C {OWL Working Group}},
title = {{OWL~2 Web Ontology Language: Document Overview}},
publisher = {W3C Recommendation},
note = {Available at \url{http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/}},
year = {27 October 2009}
}
@book{owl2-primer,
editor = {Pascal Hitzler and Markus Kr\"{o}tzsch and Bijan Parsia and
Peter F. Patel-Schneider and Sebastian Rudolph},
title = {{OWL~2 Web Ontology Language: Primer}},
publisher = {W3C Recommendation},
note = {Available at \url{http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-primer/}},
year = {27 October 2009}
}
Yes, using @book is a good idea here: bibtex recommends picking reference types by appearance, not by name (and there is no @w3cstandard anyway). The other documents can be cited like the Primer (I just use author for the overview since editor would look inappropriate at this place).
Of course you could also cite a textbook on OWL 2 ;-)
HTML5, RDFa, fights about web semantics
Jul 8 2009. The recent events in the ongoing HTML5 vs. XHTML war, quite unfortunately, are utilised by some to restart a battle of RDFa vs. microformats that appears to be rather pointless. Read more …Theory or Research?
May 5 2009. When doing a review for an IEEE journal, I have been asked to respond to the following question:
Spam without purpose
15 Dec 2008. A spam mail I just received asks me to buy an oil tanker (7,000dwt). Apparently, I am not the first to get such offers. The obvious question is: why? (I note that there is no attachement, no suspicious or different HTML component, not even links to browse to). So here are some hypotheses.Read more …Call for tourists
Sep 17 2008. For making a scientific conference a success, it is of course important to phrase the call for papers in a way that attracts contributions. So what should be written in the first paragraph? Read more …Hard wear
Sep 3 2008. Riding a caster board is a great way of getting to work. It is still important to wear protective gear. In my case, this was my rucksack, filled with a Thinkpad T41p as an additional shock absorber. It still works, though the screen dangles a little on the side where the metal joint has burst. But sitting crouched in front of this laptop for years, my spine had already suffered enough – it was about time for the machine to give something back!How I changed the world
Aug 25 2008. Of course, we all want to change the world, don't we? But in the age of the Web, we may often do so without actually noticing. Quite incidentally, I found out yesterday that I have contributed to possibly thousands of web pages. My contribution is the following:
Read more …
Semantic MediaWiki 1.2: bringing OWL to the Web
Jul 11 2008. After a lot of work it finally done: version 1.2 of Semantic MediaWiki has been released and is available for download. The new release does of course include many new features, but it also has some interesting additions regarding proper Semantic Web technologies. Read more …Semantic Web reloaded
Apr 25 2008. After quite some work during the last week, semanticweb.org now has received a new look and content organisation that is more suitable for the «Homepage of the Semantic Web». The existing content of the former ontoworld.org turned out to be rather more promissing than expected: interesting collections not only of events and people, but also of tools and ontologies did in fact exist. Now it is at the community to take the chance of using this very visible platform for advertising their work. As far as I recon, I better hire some students to support them …Semantic MediaWiki 1.1 released
Apr 20 2008. The new version of Semantic MediaWiki, SMW 1.1, is now available for download. Upgrade from SMW 1.0(.1) is very simple and needs no special scripts, but you will need MediaWiki >=1.11 now. SMW1.1 was tested up to MW1.13 alpha. Besides the mandatory bugfixes, the new release brings various additional features. Read more …
Older entries …
